Note: Races which show no vote counts following the candidate entries may be STV races, for results of those races click the STV link above
Result
Vote for 2008 ASUCSD Election
| Total
Number of Students |
Numbers |
Percentage |
| Revelle
College |
3653 |
100.0000% |
| Roosevelt
College |
3338 |
100.0000% |
| Sixth
College |
2737 |
100.0000% |
| Marshall
College |
3572 |
100.0000% |
| Muir
College |
4050 |
100.0000% |
| Warren
College |
4135 |
100.0000% |
| Campus-wide
Total |
21485 |
100.0000% |
| As
of Date for Total above: |
Apr 11 2008
12:40AM |
| Number
of Students that voted |
Numbers |
Percentage |
| Revelle
College |
327 |
8.9515% |
| Roosevelt
College |
385 |
11.5339% |
| Sixth
College |
259 |
9.4629% |
| Marshall
College |
291 |
8.1467% |
| Muir
College |
349 |
8.6173% |
| Warren
College |
345 |
8.3434% |
| Total |
1956 |
9.1040% |
| Time
of Last Vote |
Apr 11 2008
4:05PM |
Roosevelt College
Council
2.
VOTE
FOR ONE
| ALYSSA MARIE
PANYAWAI |
287 |
3.
VOTE
FOR ONE
4.
VOTE
FOR ONE
5.
| APARTMENT
REPRESENTATIVE (2) |
VOTE
FOR TWO
| ELAINE CHUN |
253 |
| JASMIN KING |
264 |
6.
VOTE
FOR ONE
7.
VOTE
FOR TWO
| CHRIS MCCOY |
103 |
| Alex Vu |
217 |
Revelle College Council
1.
2.
3.
4.
| REVELLE
ORGANIZATION CHAIR (ROC) CHAIR |
5.
| DIRECTOR OF
PUBLICITY AND CAMPUS-WIDE RELATIONS |
6.
| DIRECTOR OF
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS |
7.
8.
9.
VOTE
FOR ONE
10.
Do you approve the following
amendments to the Constitution of the Revelle College Council?
UCSD Revelle College Council Constitution
Revised February 1999,
May 2001, April 2002, November 2003, November 2005, January
2007
Article II. MembershipSection A: Members
The Council
shall be composed of the following members:
- Chairperson
- Vice-Chairperson
- Financial Controller
- Director of Communications
- Director of Publicity and Campus-wide Relations
- Director
of Enterprise Operations
- Director
of Council Programming
- Revelle Organizations Committee Chair
- Associated Students (AS) Revelle College Senators (2)
- Four Class Representatives
a. Senior Class
Representative
b. Junior Class Representative
c. Sophomore
Class Representative
d.
Freshman Class Representatives (2)
- Transfer Representative
- Commuter Representative
- Speaker of the Revelle College Assembly
Eight Three Ex-Officio Members
a.
Revelle Emerging Leaders Program Representatives
(2)
b. Resident Advisor Representative
c. Revelle
College Assembly Representative (3) (1)
d.
Revelle College Dean of Student Affairs
e. Immediate
Past Chair Pros
- Director of Enterprise and their Enterprise committee is
needed for the operation of current enterprises and creation of
new enterprises. At this point, Council has little continuity over
the years and ideas are lost. By having functional enterprises RCC
can also maximize student fees.
- Director of Council Programming and their Programming
committee is needed for the growing number of Council events,
including the annual Revelle College Festival and Welcome Week
activities as well as quarterly barbecues and dances.
- Two Freshman Class Representatives are needed on Council since
RCC currently only has one voting freshman. All other Council
positions are filled with upperclassmen elected in Spring. This
additional freshman representative would also allow for more
quarterly projects catered towards the Revelle Freshman community.
The large freshman community can be better represented on Council
with two secured freshman votes and voices.
- The Revelle Emerging Leaders Program is currently an
all-campus organization open to students from all six colleges.
Currently, all Council ex-officios come directly from Revelle
organizations specifically for Revelle students, not all campus
organizations. Since RCC funds the ELP operating budget and annual
event, their ex-officio presence also complicates funding
decisions. There are plenty of other opportunities for ELP members
to attain leadership experience besides RCC.
- The Immediate Past Chair does not truly qualify as an
ex-officio as currently defined in Council bylaws. This position
would usually only serve for 5 weeks, not an entire term. In any
case, the adviser and Council Chairperson serve as resources for
transitioning members, not the Immediate Past Chair.
Cons
- Currently there is only one Council enterprise; an additional
voting position is not needed when existing council members
maintain the enterprise themselves.
- The creation of a Director of Programming may hinder the
relationship between Council and other Revelle programming
entities.
- By having two voting freshman representatives there would be
an unequal voting representation in terms of class since there is
currently only one vote per class. Moreover, it is unclear what
this additional freshman representative would do on Council since
the existing freshman representative would fulfill their duties.
There are alternative ways to incorporate more freshmen on Council
by creating other non-voting positions.
- Losing two ELP ex-officios undermines the traditional
relationship between RCC and ELP. ELP members serve on RCC
organizations by program requirement and value their experience on
RCC. Finally, this would also restrict student government
experience for ELP members who may run for RCC positions in the
future.
- In times where past experience is necessary, having an
Immediate Past Chair ex-officio guarantees a solid transition for
the next College Council.
Warren College Council
1.
VOTE
FOR ONE
| Sabina Piras |
84 |
| COLIN SCHOLTZ |
222 |
2.
VOTE
FOR ONE
3.
VOTE
FOR ONE
4.
VOTE
FOR ONE
5.
VOTE
FOR ONE
6.
VOTE
FOR ONE
7.
VOTE
FOR ONE
Muir College Council
1.
VOTE
FOR ONE
2.
VOTE
FOR ONE
3.
VOTE
FOR ONE
| WINNIE CHAN |
166 |
| Chris Kang |
88 |
4.
| COMMISSIONER OF
PUBLIC RELATIONS |
VOTE
FOR ONE
5.
| COMMISSIONER OF
COLLEGE AND COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT |
VOTE
FOR ONE
| KAILEY P SONGER |
153 |
| SALLY KIM |
114 |
6.
| AMBASSADOR OF
MEDIA, ARTS, AND CLUBS |
VOTE
FOR ONE
7.
| AMBASSADOR OF
SERVICE, PROGRAMMING, AND
COMMITTEES |
VOTE
FOR ONE
| LAUREN ELIZABETH
ESTRELLA |
217 |
8.
VOTE
FOR ONE
Marshall College Council
1.
VOTE
FOR ONE
2.
VOTE
FOR ONE
3.
VOTE
FOR ONE
4.
| DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
RELATIONS |
VOTE
FOR ONE
| NASHWAN M OBAD |
59 |
| TIFFANY YOUNG |
171 |
5.
| STUDENT AT LARGE -
JUSTICE ADVOCATE |
VOTE
FOR ONE
| ROTEM FISHEL BEN
KENAN |
5 |
| GEORGE ESCANDON |
122 |
| REBECCA LYNN
JOHNSON |
103 |
6.
| STUDENT AT LARGE -
IMAGINATION ADVOCATE |
VOTE
FOR ONE
7.
VOTE
FOR TWO
| CARLI THOMAS |
157 |
| MONICA F FIGUEROA |
213 |
8.
How would you feel about restructuring DOC to allow for the
opportunity to volunteer within the community, take an intergroup
dialogue course, or engage in some other application of the DOC
principles?
| Very Interested |
85 |
| Interested |
84 |
| No Comment |
42 |
| Uninterested |
29 |
| Very uninterested |
29 |
Sixth College Council
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Associated Students Activity Fee Referendum
Survey
1.
| Associated Students
Activity Fee Referendum Survey |
The Associated Students Council is currently looking into the
inevitably of a student-run referendum to support and expand its
current services.
To help the AS assess what is most important to you, please
select the services/programming you would like to see
supported:
| - Student
Organizations |
1257 |
| - Sun God |
1398 |
| - Bear Gardens |
579 |
| - Pancake
Breakfast |
381 |
| - All Campus
Graduation |
608 |
| - Senior Week |
508 |
| - Safe Rides |
823 |
| - Other |
230 |
2.
In the event of a referendum, how much additional money would you
subscribe quarterly to support these events?
| - $15-$20 |
272 |
| - $10-$15 |
204 |
| - $5-$10 |
312 |
| - $5 |
254 |
| - I don’t want to increase my
student activity fee |
879 |
3.
Do you feel the AS should financially support other department
programs such as the Parking/Transportation Shuttle Services and the
University Events Office new nightclub, The Loft?
| - Yes: the AS should help finance
both |
450 |
| - The AS should only help finance
Shuttle Services |
280 |
| - The AS should only help finance
The Loft |
203 |
| - Neither: administration should
provide these services at no additional cost to
students |
964 |
Residential Security Officer
Survey
1.
| Residential
Security Officer Survey |
1. The
Resident Security Officers (RSOs) have a positive effect on the
campus climate.
| - Strongly Agree |
175 |
| - Agree |
540 |
| - Neither agree nor
disagree |
627 |
| - Disagree |
285 |
| - Strongly
Disagree |
247 |
2.
You feel safer knowing RSOs patrol student residences
| - Strongly Agree |
254 |
| - Agree |
639 |
| - Neither agree nor
disagree |
529 |
| - Disagree |
268 |
| - Strongly
Disagree |
178 |
3.
If an RSO came to your residence, you would feel comfortable to let
an RSO enter your common area.
| - Strongly Agree |
146 |
| - Agree |
485 |
| - Neither agree nor
disagree |
484 |
| - Disagree |
403 |
| - Strongly
Disagree |
343 |
4.
If an RSO came to your apartment, you would feel obligated to let an
RSO to enter your apartment.
|
